Percussa will be at Superbooth , Stand W230 - where you can see the XMX in action
note: Iāve posted this, as Bert is travelling from US ā EU for Superbooth in Berlin.
Bert is going to be manning the Superbooth stand alone this year (I couldnāt go unfortunately), so is going to be snowed underā¦
but Im happy to answer questions here, as Ive had the XMX for a while now.
anyway, itās so great for this to be unveiled, its something that Ive been collaborating on for quite a while nowā¦
you can see what Ive been up to in particularā¦ and the XMX in action, in my new video
2 Likes
I think this is brilliant! I was hoping some good news was coming to the ssp! I will donate you a coffee 
! Enjoy
1 Like
Your patching system feels like it will be so much faster and less confusing. Looking forward to it coming to SSP. Well done!
2 Likes
thanks @I-AM-SAM and @marcusfischer
thanks, I want the Trax interface to be as effortless as possible, whilst also being focused on hands-on performanceā¦ so its incorporating ideas Ive had for a while for a āhostā.
that said, doing this ābehind closed doorsā its not gone thru the important āfeedbackā stage.
so, Im quite looking forward to getting this out in some formā¦ for the community to have a play with, and see which areas work well, and areas that donāt.
generally, developing a UI for a small form factor is a challenge, and is full of compromisesā¦ thats where priorities become important, and so users/devs can have different opinions ā¦ even within myself as both developer and musician, we have conflicts 
as for patching in synthor, an interesting tidbit,
the approach to patching modules in Synthor on XMX has been altered/simplified. you now just select input and output, there is no enabling of inputs.
ofc, at the moment, the focus has been getting (an updated) synthor working on xmx.
idk, if or when these changes may come to SSP - thatās up to Bert.
(though personally, I think synergy in the code base tends to make support easier)
oh, and I should also sayā¦ Synthor on the XMX, is much improved since the clip I included in my videoā¦ things are moving fast !
1 Like
I really do hope an updated patching system becomes part of the SSP (or just a full on Trax alt firmware)
Focusing on performance is great. I mostly use modular as a performance instrument and less so for composition. Your midi mapping workflow is really well done and will be super helpful.
2 Likes
This is great news! Iām excited to learn more. And +1 to bringing updated patching to SSP.
2 Likes
whatās in the name?
for what stands XMX ?
1 Like
honestly, no ideaā¦
it might not mean anything, or might mean anything you want it too 
(there were a few names being thrown around, I cannot remember when this one emerged first)
Do plugins made by the MAX RNBO template work on XMX also?
that could be more difficult than it seems as SSP runs 32bit Linux and XMX runs 64bit Linux
yup, Ive update the generator to now be able to create compatible plugins.
in factā¦ when you generate the plugin, the same plugin will be compatible with both SSP and XMX āout of the boxā
1 Like
not sure I
not sure I understand?
it doesnāt really make a alot of difference, you just use a different compiler.
the only exception is if you include code that explicitly used 32bit fpu instructions (neon).
many dsp libraries (etc) will include implementations for 32bit (neon) and 64 bit(vfpv4) , so not an issue.
bare in mind, 64 bit arm, is used widely on desktops, and aarch64 is the same target as you used for apple siliconā¦ which is how I build my plugins anyway.
ofc, there are exceptions too thisā¦ the notable one is mutable instruments code.
this was developed for a microcontroller like the STM32F4, so is optimised for neon.
however, it does have a āless optimised modeā which is used by desktops (e.g. vcvrack) etc, which we have to resort to for the xmx, whereas the SSP can used the optimised form.
ā¦ so highly depends, but generally, the 32 vs 64bit is nothing more than compiling differently.
2 Likes
Awesome!!
I had been hooked with roland mc-707 recently but it will make me pull back to explore of SSP and XMX!
1 Like
coolā¦
I really hope the the XMX will help invigorate the whole percussa family.
itās smaller form factor, and being 1/4 the price of the SSP , means I think itāll have more widespread appeal.
but its also quite a different beast to the SSP,
for sure, the SSP remains the āpowerhouseā (cpu, io, display etc) ,
but the essence is very much present in the XMXā¦ and is really nice when you need a smaller form factor.
(I love the XMX in a small case, using it to mix, using it with headphones :))
and if we keep compatibility between the two, that opens up many options.
also, now Im working a bit ālower levelā, Ive really started to appreciate both the SSP and XMX as a development platform i.e. beyond just adding plugins to synthor.
on both the hardware is really nice, and theres a lot of care and attention to detail that Bert has taken which is behind the scenes, so we donāt usually see.
e.g. the move to buildroot for the SSP was a really important step that as users we dont care about. - but, Im starting now to āfeelā the benefits of that unseen work.
anyway, I hope that the community expands, this would certainly help sustain development etc.
Does the headphone output duplicate the main output pair or is it separately addressable, so you can basically have 4 output channels?
Itās a duplicate of the main output.
So, itās limited to the 2 channels out.
There is an expansion header, so I guess if the module proved popular, itād be possible to create expansion modules including more io.
( though ofc, thatās not just hardware , itād need firmware updates to support)
2 Likes
Wow! This looks really good - I too would love to see Trax come to the SSP as alternative firmware. Itās clearly set up for performance and thatās a very good thing.
1 Like